Subject: Airport Link Construction

Charles, Hi.

Pleased to meet you.

Since learning of the Proposed Wooloowin Worksite, the Kalinga Wooloowin
Residents Association Inc (KWRA) have worked hard in the incredibly short
time frame to inform themselves of the situation at a number of levels.
As an Engineer myself, albeit in a different field, I strive to understand
the facts in any situation.  The acquisition of relevant and timely
information from TJH, BrisConnections or CNI in regard to the Proposed
Wooloowin Worksite has been little short of totally inadequate - I am
quietly hopeful dialogue with you might be different.

With regard to specific geotechnical information, before we go any further
could you please answer the following question,

 "Who, of TJH, BrisConnection and CNI, has Borehole Log APL06 on file?"

 Please answer "yes" or "no" for each entity (3 in total).

With regard to Community Liaison Groups, the following is an excerpt of
correspondence from the KWRA with Anthony Mines following our meeting with
the Department of Infrastructure and Planning,

 "A Wooloowin Community Liason Group (FORMED ONLY IF THE SITE GOES
  AHEAD) would be a separate entity to the KWRA.  It would most probably
  consult with the KWRA.  The Community Liason Groups appear to be
  formalised upon acceptance of works in the specified area.  The KWRA
  do not recognise this form of acceptance."

In other words we are not really interested in CLG information.  Forming
a CLG, or an intent to, indicates acquiescence, something we are long way
away from.  We have discussed CLG operation with other resident groups in
the area.  They view CLGs as a unidirectional vehicle.

Urban legend has it your initial reaction to the suggestion of the Proposed
Wooloowin Worksite was "There's no way the residents will let the Rose St
site go ahead".  From this I conclude you may be a reasonable man and that
your gut reaction was right.

I leave the simple borehole log question in your capable hands.

Best Regards,

Greg.